there was a very interesting article published on a very rare form of blood cancer, LGLL or large granular lymphocytic leukemia.
T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia (LGLL) is a rare clonal disease often associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and manifests chiefly as neutropenia and recurrent infections. Immunosuppressive agents are the mainstay of treatment, but long-term remissions are rare. We report 2 cases of LGLL in patients with RA successfully treated with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody specific of B cells and approved for treating RA. The first patient experienced a complete LGLL remission that was sustained during the 8-year follow-up after the first rituximab infusion. In the second patient, rituximab therapy was followed by immediate neutropenia recovery and then by marked shrinkage of the LGLL clone 1 year later. The paradoxical efficacy of this specific anti–B-cell drug on a monoclonal T-cell disease suggests that some cases of LGLL may be reactive manifestations of chronic autoantigen stimulation rather than true malignancies.
I added the bold because this jamming on of reactive pathways with all its nasty downstream consequences is similar to what we are trying to block with BTK and PI3K inhibitors in CLL. In CLL, we are trying to shut down the constitutively stimulated B cells by blocking their pro-survival communication, proliferative, and homing instincts.
Further down is the report we find:
As illustrated by our first patient, T-cell LGLL is frequently associated with concomitant low-grade B-cell dyscrasias, such as monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, suggesting that a common antigen may drive both T- and B-cell proliferation.
That is powerful talk. Yet to be proven, but worthy of more research.
Maybe that is why anti-T cells therapies such as ciclosporin help some in CLL, yours truly included.
Everything in the complex immune system is so connected.
This type of creative systemic thinking is exactly what will be needed to completely and finally shut done the monoclonal B cell factory that is CLL. We may need to read the green tea leaves in more than our CLL teacups to find our answers. We need to look at the research being done in other liquid and solid cancers. Some of the fantastic new immune therapies in metastatic melanoma
as detailed in my prior post from ASCO 2013
immediately come to mind as future paths to pursue.
Last, but not least, and while the issue may be just semantic and this is only two cases, all of us with CLL would much prefer to live with a "reactive manifestations of chronic autoantigen stimulation rather than true malignancies", especially if such labeling leads to better therapeutic approaches and better outcomes.
I am off to Germany on Monday for iwCLL. Send me your burning thoughts and questions that I might share with all the CLL gurus gathered in Cologne.