Here
is an edited excerpt of a letter that I sent to a long time friend who lives
near the Canadian border in northern Washington state. I cut out the
personal stuff.
Since
my dad's illness and passing, I have not been up to visit much so I wanted to
bring him up to pace.
It
gives a decent executive summary of my last year with CLL. I have cut some
corners with the data and details, but it paints the picture, and it at least
for me, it is a prettier picture these days than it has been in a long time.
After the letter is my commentary of what I believe are the significant unmet needs as related to ibrutinib and other similar drugs. I talk mostly about ibrutinib because it is what I know best, and believe at least for me was the best possible choice.
Hi,
It’s been too long since I
last brought you up to date on my latest “trials” with leukemia in particular
and life in general.
It has been a wild ride
for sure. Your parting wish to go with gusto was certainly prophetic.
Despite my best efforts to
make peace with my cancer with a calming diet and a calmer lifestyle, my evil
clone has mutated to a more aggressive form. Fatigue, huge nodes, and malaise.
In one of my more
prescient and courageous acts, I was fortunate to win a fight with my HMO to
get authorized to grab one of the last openings in clinical trial at Ohio State
with what now appears to be a game changing medication. I have been commuting
to Columbus for months now. My nodes melted to half their size in the first 30
days while stamina and sense of well being rebounded.
My new miracle pill,
ibrutinib doesn’t kill the cancer, but it controls it- similar to insulin in
diabetes. Stop taking it and the cancer can jump right back at you.
You would appreciate the
way it works. It blocks critical communications with other blood cells. Think a
whole cell condom. Cancer birth control. The cancer cells lose their support
network, become unanchored from their safe niches in the lymph nodes and bone
marrow and float aimlessly in the more exposed and vulnerable reaches of the
blood stream. At first, the white count shoots up as the cells depart on mass
from their lards, suggesting disease progression, but a few months later the
counts falls as the clone dies of loneliness (actually lack of pro-survival and
pro-proliferative signaling). And the more aggressive the cancer, the more it
likes the crosstalk, and so the pills may be most potent on the worst
leukemias.
Response rates are >
90% in tough refractory and relapsed patients. And because it is not a killer,
there are few side effects. It’s still an early story, it’s probably not a
cure, and it’s only available in trials to the many who need it. And many more
need it than can get it.
Be well
Brian
Access is the big problem now. And it
may persist into the future as well.
I am doing great, and so are many others I
know that are in clinical trials at OSU or the NIH or elsewhere. But
thousands are not doing so well and might benefit from ibrutinib and others like it. For some, there time is running out. The many emails and posts about how to get
into a trial or compassionate use are testimony to this tragic unmet need.
There are other needs too. Less
pressing today, but maybe more significant in the long run.
We need robust data. For how long and
for how many will it work? Are some
combos better than others? Will new side effects emerge down the line? Who will relapse and how will those relapses
look? These are only some of the many unanswered questions. The answers will take time, often many years. All of it will take carefully
planned and conducted trials. That means strict inclusion and exclusion
criteria. That means that too many patients who have exhausted their options will have no ibrutinib or similar trial to
turn to.
We need to get this and other similar drugs FDA approved as
soon as possible. That starts by filling all the spots in the pivotal trials,
even when the chances to get ibrutinib are only 50/50. The phase III trial is
the acid test, the potential proof that this BTK inhibitor meets, at a predetermined significant level, an unmet
need or that it exceeds what is out there in terms of an agreed surrogate markers for what we all really want - longer progression free survival. Right now no-one has been on it much
more than two years, and only a few hundred people in the whole world have ever swallowed the
battleship grey pills. It’s a small and short cohort. We have so much to learn and the phase III data will be a huge boon.
Once it is approved, probably in a few years, the restrictions
then would be from the payors (Medicare and private insurers) who might not
limit the use of the drug, but who could refuse to pay for any therapy that
even slightly deviates from those for which it was licensed. If it is priced anything
like Revlimid and other new oral cancer drugs, that could effectively put the
drug, out of reach for most of us. We would either have to match the exact indication
on the package insert and perhaps even more age and health restrictions demanded
by the insurance company, or we would have to be very rich. Accordingly, we may
need to push to improve access again, even after it hits the market.
And that is not the end of the story. When it on the market we will still need to ask our friends in the pharmaceutical companies and the research
institutes to keep looking for better drug combos and new compounds so we can
cure our disease once and for all.
We all need to work together- patients, providers, advocates, payers, academics, government, foundations, and pharma to get this done.
We always know it would be a long
journey. And the pace is frustratingly slow, but for the first time ever, we just might be seeing the finish line. And that is a very pretty picture indeed.
Please let me know what you think, what needs you see, and your ideas on how we might meet them.
After all, WE ARE IN THIS TOGETHER.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home