Saturday, December 1, 2012

Another Reason to Exercise: It Lowers the Risk of Blood Cancers

I am just starting to review the abstracts from ASH and this one stood out.

It tried to determine if exercise lowered your risk of blood cancers. It also seems by the title (Regular Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Hematologic Malignancies: Results From the Prospective Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) Study) that they were researching the benefits of vitamins, but they did not report on that. I wonder why? Maybe I will get a chance to ask the investigators at ASH next week.

It is a big prospective study and that is good. They also controlled for most risks factors such as smoking and family history, also good. But the history was mostly self -reported which as first seems bad, but if you think about it, more people will likely exaggerate rather than minimize the amount of exercise they do. That would tend to weaken the effect of the actual amount of exercise and make finding any true relationship more unlikely.

What they did find is that in this group of 50-76 year olds, the more exercise, the less cancer. The reduction was big, more than a third for those getting their heart rates up 3.5 times a week or more. The negative association was strongest for myeloid cancer, cutting the rate in half for the those who exercised the most. Wow! But there was only a statistically insignificant trend for CLL and there was no effect for plasma cell cancers.

I wonder why the effects would be so so different for different cell lines.

What I can tell you that I already have CLL so I can't lower my risk. None of us with CLL can. We are at 100%, but although we already have CLL, most of us don't have a secondary myeloid cancer, at least not yet. The bad news is that our disease and its treatment, especially alkylating agents such as bendamustine, cytoxan, and chlorambucil and purine analogues (fludarabine) greatly increases our odds of these blood cancers. I will present some new papers on this topic later. Therefore anything I can do to that might lower my risk of these secondary cancers, these killers, is a no brainer.

Another reason for all of us to get moving. The more, the better.

Here's the abstract. The highlights are my addition.


87 Regular Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Hematologic Malignancies: Results From the Prospective Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) Study
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 613. Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Pathophysiology & Clinical Studies: Basic
Tuesday, December 11, 2012: 8:30 AM
A103, Level 1, Building A (Georgia World Congress Center)
Roland B. Walter, MD, PhD1,2, Sarah A. Buckley, MD3* and Emily White, PhD4,5*
1Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 2Department of Medicine/Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 3Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
4Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
5Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
Background: Recreational physical activity (PA) provides numerous health benefits, including a reduction in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and promotion of mental health. Increasing evidence from epidemiological studies also links PA to a reduced risk of major human cancers, particularly those of the colon and breast. On the other hand, previous case-control and cohort studies examining the relationship of PA and incident hematologic malignancies yielded inconsistent results. Given these conflicting findings, we used a large prospective cohort study to examine this association.
Patients and Methods: 65,322 men and women aged 50-76 years were recruited from 2000-2002 to the VITamins And Lifestyle (VITAL) study. The PA questionnaire at baseline asked about walking by intensity and two broader categories of activities (mild and moderate/strenuous exercise) by type over the past 10 years. For each activity, a corresponding metabolic equivalent (MET) intensity was assigned. Incident hematologic malignancies (n=666) after study enrollment were identified through December 2009 by linkage to the SEER cancer registry. Hazards ratios (HRs) for total incident hematologic malignancies and cancer subcategories associated with PA averaged over the previous 10 years before baseline were estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, self-rated health, daily fruit and vegetable consumption, body mass index, fatigue, self-reported anemia, and family history of leukemia/lymphoma.
Results: After adjustment, there was a decreased risk of hematologic malignancies associated with any PA (HR=0.75 [95% CI: 0.61-0.94]) as well as any moderate/high-intensity activity (HR=0.72 [95% CI: 0.57-0.92]). The reduction in risk was greatest among the physically most active participants, both with regard to number of weekly episodes of activity (>4.8 episodes of all activities per week: HR=0.66 [95% CI: 0.51-0.86], P=0.005 for trend; >3.5 episodes of moderate/high-intensity activities per week: HR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.44-0.82], P=0.002 for trend) and metabolic activity (>13.625 MET of all activities per week: HR=0.71 [95% CI: 0.54-0.92], P=0.029 for trend; >11.2972 MET of moderate/high-intensity activities per week: HR=0.65 [95% CI: 0.48-0.89], P=0.005 for trend), respectively. To address the possibility of reverse causation, i.e. the possibility that study participants were physically less active as a result of a yet undiagnosed hematologic malignancy, we repeated these analyses after exclusion of the 146 incident cases that occurred within 2 years of baseline: the reduction in risk of incident hematologic malignancies among the physically most active participants in this study subset was relatively similar to that of the entire study cohort. When we stratified malignancies by WHO disease classification, we found that the association between PA and incident hematologic malignancy was strongest for myeloid neoplasms (HR=0.48 [95% CI: 0.29-0.79] for highest tertile of all PA, P=0.013 for trend; HR=0.40 [0.21-0.77] for highest tertile of moderate/high-intensity PA, P=0.016 for trend). There were also significant associations between episodes of moderate/high intensity PA and incident mature B-cell lymphomas other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) or plasma cell disorders (>3.5 episodes per week: HR=0.59 [95% CI: 0.36-0.97], P=0.035 for trend) and between episodes of all activities and incident CLL/SLL (>4.8 episodes per week: HR=0.52 [95% CI: 0.26-1.03], P=0.023 for trend). No associations were found with incident plasma cell disorders.
Conclusion: Our study offers the strongest epidemiological evidence to date to suggest that regular recreational PA is associated with a dose-dependently reduced incidence of certain hematologic malignancies, with a greater than 50% reduction of risk for the development of neoplasms of myeloid origin for individuals within the top tertile of all or moderate/high-intensity activities. Our data also suggest a trend toward reduced risk for CLL/SLL and other mature B-cell NHLs except plasma cell disorders, although further studies in larger cohorts of participants will be required to assess these associations further. Together, our findings may thus suggest additional important health benefits attributable to regular PA. 

Labels: , ,

Monday, October 31, 2011

Fitness and Cancer: A Guest Posting


Please take a look at this guest blog by David Haas who can also be found at :http://www.mesothelioma.com/blog/
In the way of self introduction he says:
I am a cancer patient advocate who writes and researches for the betterment of others.”
His topic for today's posting is fitness and cancer.
I know first hand that my transplant doctor, Dr. Forman, insists that all his patients walk on the transplant floor. That meant for me donning a mask and gloves, and waltzing through the nursing corridors with my heavy laden IV pole attached to my left arm through my PICC line even when I felt like crap.
The nurses, who should know, say that those who walk, walk out.
I know there are many benefits to exercise starting with this chestnut courtesy of Dr. Himle:
"Depression has a lot of trouble finding a moving target, 
it's outstanding at hitting a stationary one."
Take a look at this link http://www.lymphomation.org/CAM-diet.htm#exercise for more on the exercise and cancer topic. I am a believer.
Please let me know how you feel about this idea of guess blogs.
Here's David's writing.
Fitness and Cancer
It stands to reason that someone who has been recently diagnosed any kind of cancer including common cancers such as breast cancer and skin cancer and even rare cancers like mesothelioma wouldn't want to spend a lot of time exercising. The shock of having been diagnosed with an often fatal disease combined with the sickness, pain and fatigue associated with said disease can all but destroy any motivation that one would have for remaining or becoming physically fit. Physical fitness is important for everybody, even those who are suffering from cancer. Recent studies have found that while a regular exercise regimen is by no means a miracle mesothelioma treatment or a cure for any other kind of cancer, it has helped aid the recovery and improved the prognosis of many cancer patients.

Two of the most common and debilitating side effects of most traditional cancer treatments are fatigue and loss of muscle strength. Cancer treatments such as chemotherapy tend to make patients feel very fatigued, so naturally they do not want to spend a lot of time doing much of anything, let alone engage in any kind of exercise. The muscle weakness commonly experienced by cancer patients naturally results from this fatigue. As they are deprived of exercise, these patients also miss out on some of the benefits that come from being physically fit including improved sleep patterns, increased energy, decreased depression and a generally improved sense of wellbeing. In other words, exercise can help a cancer patient or cancer survivor get his or her life back.

One form of exercise that many experts suggest for cancer patients is lightweight training. It's already been established that many cancer treatments cause a weakness in the muscles, so a weight-training program has proven to be very beneficial for many patients undergoing chemotherapy or similar treatments. It is not recommended that anyone who is experiencing fatigue or muscle weakness attempt any rigorous weight training exercises, but there are plenty of light exercises that can be done that will still help to build lean muscle mass and improve the overall fitness of cancer survivors.

The American Cancer Society has become so convinced by the benefits of exercise for cancer patients that they have implemented moderate exercise programs for patients who have been newly diagnosed with cancer. These exercise programs can technically be considered palliative therapy, which means that while they will not cure or treat the cancer directly they will at least improve the symptoms of the disease or treatment.


Labels: ,