Want to avoid chemotherapy or taking an expensive medication foreverfor your CLL (chronic lymphocytic leukemia)? I may have a clinicaltrial for you.

METHYLPREDNISOLONE

I and many others have railed against chemotherapy for our CLL. It may give us a long remission, or not.  Your mileage will vary and those of us with anything but the best prognostics can be pretty sure that we will relapse too soon for our liking with a nastier clone. FCR may even cure a few very select low risk patients, though that is yet to be proven. But at what cost?  Possible bone marrow damage and immunosuppression leading to low blood counts, infections, and secondary cancers.

Many of us also worry about the risks and cost of being on a life long medication no matter how targeted and patient friendly it might be. This fear is not so much based on any evidence of a problem (as there are not many problems and the data generally keeps getting better as the years roll along), but more based on the opposite: the lack of evidence with any of the new oral agents about their real long term safety, because no one had been on them for more than five years at this time.

So that is why this trial at UCSD with Dr. Januario Castro deserves our consideration. Besides being the innovator in the research on HDMP, Dr. Castro is a super nice guy. Still, entering any trial is a huge decision and by its very nature is full of unknowns.

A PHASE IB/II STUDY OF OBINUTUZUMAB (GA101) IN COMBINATION WITH HIGH-DOSE METHYLPREDNISOLONE (HDMP) IN CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CLL) PATIENTS. (GA101 & HDMP)

The team of Drs. Kipps and Castro and more recently Choi has been a leader for years in innovative less toxic treatments for CLL. HDMP especially in combination with rituximab or ofatumumab has proven efficacy in all flavors of CLL including those of us with the stubborn 17p deletion. Here is link to an article on HDMP+R in frontline therapy. I quote:" With over 3 years of follow-up median progression-free survival was 30.3 months with only 39% of patients requiring additional therapy, and an overall survival was 96%." Similar results have been published here with HPMP + ofatumumab.

There are reasons to believe that this new trial may do even better. Obinutuzumab is a more potent mAb (monoclonal antibody) than its predecessors.  Remember that when it was combined with chlorambucil it proved superior to ritximab: This abstract from NEJM states: "Treatment with obinutuzumab–chlorambucil, as compared with rituximab–chlorambucil, resulted in prolongation of progression-free survival." Its 20.7% complete response rate in combination with wimpy chlorambucil is also encouraging, so it suggests that adding Gazyva to another cytotoxic agent, in this case HDMP makes good sense.


Not that either HDMP or obinutuzumab are without their risks. HDMP can cause a short term increase chance of serious infections, diabetes, fluid retention and psychiatric issues to mention but a few of the possible adverse events. Gazyva can be associated with scary infusion reactions. One definitely needs a team that has experience with this heavy weight arsenal. USCD certainly does. And the good news is that neither therapy is myelosuppressive and neither should have long term sequelae.

The rap against HDMP, justified or not, is that the remissions have not been that durable. This trial hopes to squash that story. But no one knows. That's why it's called a trial.

So are you interested?

The best news is that unlike other trials for attractive therapies where inclusion criteria may be fairly narrow, this trial welcomes nearly all comers. See below. I especially like: A. Documented refusal to be treated with chemotherapy agents.  Do you think patient advocates may have been a factor in kicking open the gate that wide? Here are some of the inclusion criteria copied from clinical trials.gov.

Laboratory parameters as specified below:

• Hematologic: Hemoglobin > 8 g/dL (may be post-transfusion); platelet count > 40 x103/mm3 (may be post-transfusion). Absolute neutrophil count > 1.0 109 cells/mm3 (Growth factor use is allowed).
• Hepatic: Total Bilirubin < 3 x ULN, and ALT and AST < 3 x ULN
• Renal: Creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min (Calculated according to institutional standards or using Cockcroft-Gault formula. Subjects with requirement of hemodialysis will be excluded).

Subjects can be enrolled and treated under this protocol regardless of their CLL treatment history or number of previous treatments. In addition, subjects with history of allogeneic stem cell transplant can be enrolled and treated unless they have active manifestations of graft vs. host disease (GVHD) or chronic illness or infections that will prevent them from completing the study.

Previously untreated subjects that meet ANY of the following criteria: A. Documented refusal to be treated with chemotherapy agents. B. Subjects that are not candidates for treatment with chemotherapy based on poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 2), advance age (> 65 years), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS score) ≥ 6 or cytopenias.

These are extraordinarily liberal rules for eligibility for any trial.

I don't know where HDMP+OB will fit in. No-one does. That's why we need this trial. It is particularly attractive to anyone who want to avoid chemo (who doesn't), is willing to document their reluctance, and does not qualify for other non-chemo trials. But it also should appeal to any of us with 17p deletion or any of us who just want to have six months of non-chemo treatment and then hopefully coast for a long long while.

Finally to be clear, I don't have any personal connection with this trial other than my history of being a patient at UCSD. Moreover, while I believe that for some of us, it is worthy of careful review for the reasons I have detailed, the decision about entering any trial must be personal and cautiously weighed. Thankfully there are growing numbers of non-chemo and chemo options out there.

It's all a gamble: hope as I am doing to ride a TKI (ibrutinib) into the happy ever after sunset or whack the CLL hard monthly for half a year and pray that it is so far gone that it ain't ever coming back.

Sunset at Corona del Mar

IF YOU WANT A PERSONAL RESPONSE OR TO JUST STAY IN TOUCH, PLEASE SEND YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS TO BKOFFMANMD@GMAIL.COM AS I OTHERWISE DO NOT RECEIVE THEM.

ASCO 2013: Dr. Wierda Discusses Immune Therapies in CLL

In this first of several interviews from ASCO 2013, Dr. Bill Wierda of MDACC discusses immunity in general (or lack there of) in CLL and how that relates to the coming immune therapies.

He starts by explaining the basic difference between passive and active immune therapies.

His candid review of the trials so far points out the recurrent disappointments in the attempts to develop active immune therapies.

The story with passive immunity has had more success.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as rituximab or alemtuzumab were the pioneers of targeted immune therapy and have in many cases improved outcomes when added to chemotherapy without significantly increasing toxicity. Newer mAbs hold the promise of even deeper responses with few of the downsides of traditional chemotherapy and may even prove to work well without the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Already useful examples include Rituximab and Revlimid or lenalidomide (R2) and the combo of HDMP (high dose methylprednisilone) + Ofatumumab. Powerful therapies with no chemo.

GA101 or obinutuzumab, a third generation anti CD20 mAB had received breakthrough status at the FDA and may be approved before the end of the year. The early data suggest this is both a potent and well tolerated treatment, hence the rush to get it to the clinic.

Passive immunity also includes the exciting CAR-T therapies that Dr. Wierda discusses. These are still in very early trials, but a few cases such as those out of U. Penn have seen spectacular saves when patients had all but ran out of all conventional options.

Immune modulating drugs (IMIDS) such as lenalidomide are in the early days of studies to figure out how they fit into the therapeutic landscape, but are clearly active in CLL and may improve some aspects of our impaired immunity,

This segues to another topic that gets Dr. Wierda really excited.

He tells of his research into ways to improve our immunity, to reconstitute our lost ability to fight off infections and to search and destroy the earliest microscopic cancers before they can grab hold and cause problems. Infections and secondary cancers are what kill those of us with CLL, and Dr. Wierda is fighting for ways not only to knock out our blood malignancy, but to also prevent us from dying not from our cancer itself, but from the damage the CLL (and its treatment) have already done to our ability to protect ourselves from infections and secondary malignancies.

This interview is from ASCO 2013 in June in Chicago.

It was great fun working with Andrew Schorr and the dedicated team from Patient Power in doing these interviews. I am grateful for their efforts and support and the willingness of the doctors to share their work at such a busy conference.

Look for more CLL interviews here over the next few weeks and keep checking Patient Power for other interviews that Andrew and I did on other cutting edge treatments for different cancers at ASCO in Chicago. Many of these have direct implications for how CLL may be treated in the future.

Here is Dr. Wierda:


Tomorrow it will be a full six weeks since my last IVIG infusion and blood draw. This is the longest I have gone without IVIG in the last six years and the longest I have gone without lab test since my first year with CLL.

I will report from the infusion center tomorrow.

Alemtuzumab in Combination With Methylprednisolone for 17p deleted patients

J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 10;30(14):1647-55. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

Alemtuzumab in Combination With Methylprednisolone Is a Highly Effective Induction Regimen for Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Deletion of TP53: Final Results of the National Cancer Research Institute CLL206 Trial.

Pettitt AR, Jackson R, Carruthers S, Dodd J, Dodd S, Oates M, Johnson GG, Schuh A, Matutes E, Dearden CE, Catovsky D, Radford JA, Bloor A, Follows GA,Devereux S, Kruger A, Blundell J, Agrawal S, Allsup D, Proctor S, Heartin E, Oscier D, Hamblin TJ, Rawstron A, Hillmen P.

This article (link here) is notable for three things.

First, it offers a very impressive response rate in the most difficult to treat patients. 85% overall with 36% CR (complete remission).  7 of10 patients with lymph nodes > 5 cm responded and two had CRs. Wow!

Second, it has a very high risk of serious infections. I quote:

"Grade 3 to 4 infection occurred in 51% of the overall cohort and in 29% of patients less than 60 years of age. Treatment-related mortality was 5%"

Still it is an options for those with 17p del who have so few options and a trial with tyrosine kinase inhibitor is not in the cards. It makes most sense in younger patients, younger being less than 60. It could be a bridge to transplant as median progression free survival was about a year, time enough to get the transplant team rolling and get the Campath out of your system.

Overall, however, it is a risky path as both HDMP(Methylprednisolone) and alemtuzumab (Campath) are very immunosuppressive. It is not just the risk of catching some bug. It is the risk of waking up something you already caught and that has been dormant for years such as zoster or CMV. The steroids have other significant side effects too and surprising  two out of three patients had grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities.

I might opt for HDMP+O myself if I wasn't in this ibrutinib + O trial here at OSU, but the data on HDMP + A is very persuasive and would need to be carefully considered.

Third and final point, one of the authors is the late great and much beloved Terry Hamblin. While admittedly, some of this is old data presented in 2009, it is updated for this 2012 publication months after his passing. 

Truly Dr. Hamblin lives on in the work he has done and so much more.

What a blessing his life was for those of us who knew him.

On personal note, I am continuing to do well in Columbus with my three grey pills of ibrutinib every morning. Looking forward to a few weeks of no infusions. I have less gut issues, more muscle pains, and smaller nodes. Life is good.

If the weather is good tomorrow I am going canoeing in Darby Creek. Dinner with new friends. Tonight went for a sunset walk in Prairie Oaks, a beautiful Metro Park. The Kings (HOW BOUT THOSE KINGS?) are on TV here.

I really like Columbus.

I am also really glad I will be home to stay in a few weeks. 

I have Stanley Cup playoff tickets that are finally useful and I have to sell them all. It probably will all be over just a few days before I get home. Maybe I can still catch the victory parade.

GO KINGS GO

PS. I love this kind of post: Raw science, good news, dear friends, nature, and hockey in one sweep!