Thursday, May 7, 2015

Three Year Anniversary on Ibrutinib for my CLL (chronic lymphocytic leukemia)

A Man and his Pills

On May 7, 2012, I swallowed my first three battleship grey pills of PCI-32765, later to be known as ibrutinib and finally Imbruvica when approved by the FDA for relapsed/refractory CLL in February, 2014. For us early adapters, most of whom like me, are still doing well in the subsequent extension trial, it is still the same grey pill and it is still called PCI-32765.

Clinical Trial NCT01217749 or PCYC-1109-CA out of Ohio State University (OSU) was a phase 1b/2 trial mixing the then very new BTK inhibitor with the then newest antibody, ofatumumab. I was in the last of three cohort. My group received the monoclonal antibody first so I actually started the trial a few months before I got to the ibrutinib. Details are described here.

Turns out that my cohort did the poorest as a bunch. Better to use the oral signal blocker first or even simultaneously to empty most of the cancer cells out of the marrow and nodes where the antibody can pick them off with no interference from their microenvironment enablers. That's why we do trials: do figure this stuff out.

But statistics predict for groups and here I am three years later in a deep deep remission. My absolute lymph count is at the low end of normal at 1000 and only 0.8% of those cells are clonal. If we do the math with just a few calculations we figure out that I only have 8 cancer cells in each microliter of blood. That not bad for someone who has a complex karyotype, 17p and 11q deletions, ZAP 70+, unmutated, CD38+, and a failed transplant.

Excellent disease control and a very deep remission, but not MRD negative. And certainly not cured.

For that elusive cure, I and most CLL patients will need a cocktail, preferably of target therapies. Fortunately some researchers agree and such trials are opening up.

During these last three years my blog has morphed from talking about my ups and downs in managing my CLL into a more universal story about the changing research and treatment paradigms in our disease.

Our newly launched nonprofit's CLL Society website: http://cllsociety.org will increasingly be taking on that educational role and my blog will return to being more my personal journey and the place for me to vent and pontificate.

Just this week, our website has several new articles: an article on the WHO statement on clinical trials, the news about the breakthrough therapy designation for ABT-199 or venetoclax for my fellow 17p deleted patients, and two cool interviews with Professor Roberts from Melbourne, part of our conference coverage,  which were done at ASH 2014. Dr. Roberts talks about the mechanism of action of and the early result with venetoclax or ABT-199, a drug that he helped develop in Australia.

Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday we will be adding new videos and articles, so check back frequently. Already on some days, the one month old http://cllsociety.org is helping more folks affected by CLL than this venerable blog.

I have been asked by pessimists and worriers: How long and deep will the CLL Society's efforts at education, support, news, and advocacy continue? 

The answer is: As long as there is the need and the support for what we are doing, we will keep going.

Realistically, we desperately need to staff up in order to keep going at this pace and to expand what we are already doing. We have big plans that demand more than any one or two people can do, but we are just starting up and I am confident we will soon have the resources we need.

Stay strong.

We are all in this together.

Brian

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 1, 2014

Good News from OSU About my CLL ( Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia)

It is no fun to travel on Thanksgiving weekend across the country to OSU, spending hours in busy airports full of long lines of irritable flyers, but I am know that I am one lucky patient and I am grateful for my good care and my good drugs, even if it means crossing 3 time zones and leaving sunny beachy California for cold and wet Columbus, Ohio.

When I started on my ibrutinib trial two and half years ago there was a definite buzz about this new oral med that might change everything.

Well the game has changed, or more accurately is changing, and it is only going to get better with new non-chemo combos and second and third generation kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies  (mAbs) offering us more and more options.

We aren't there yet, but we are moving fast (but not fast enough for those of us who need answers now) in the direction of long term disease control. Cure is still elusive, but there is now an active area of research on curing CLL, sometime inconceivable a few years back.

I am an example of the early changes.

Before ibrutinib and idelalisib and ABT-199 and now the second generation kinase inhibitors and the new mAbs came along in trials, someone like me with a failed transplant and a clone of 17p deleted bad boys had fewer choices than a vegan at a Texas BBQ stand.

Now 30 months into my ibrutinib adventure, I have a boringly healthy blood chemistry, and a mundane CBC (complete blood count) with a normal numbers of my red blood cells, my neutrophils, my platelets, and an absolute lymphocyte count of only 1.04

If you dig deep enough with PCR or sensitive flow cytometry, I suspect my cancerous clone is still lurking in the less that one percent of my B cells that still carried the signs of being part of the nasty cancerous clone gang when checked three months ago at OSU.

But as I said much to happy about it. And many reasons to give thanks.

Now with my personal good results locked in for another three months until I return for my next OSU clinic visit, I am off to ASH 2014 to bring the broader good news and to push the CLL researchers and pharmaceutical industry no to take their foot off the gas until we have a cure for us all.

Let me know if you have any burning questions for the researchers at ASH.

Life is good.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, August 25, 2014

Approval of Imbruvica Frontline for 17p deleted CLL (Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia) and Important Trials

It's old news (July 28, 2014), but worthy of some reflection that ibrutinib ( PCI-32765 or Imbruvica) was approved frontline in CLL for those of unfortunate enough to have a deletion of the short (petite or p) arm of chromosome 17.

The p53 gene lives on the 17p arm so when it's deleted, there's missing p53. Without functional p53, cancer cells don't die very easily of apoptosis, the programmed death pathway built into all cells that allows them to suicide when they get too old to function, or in the case of our leukemic cells, become increasingly aberrant and dysfunctional. Without  the tumor suppressing p53 gene, the "guardian of the genome", protecting and repairing our DNA and if that fails, then starting to fire up the self destruction pathway, our cancer continues to grow and mutate and get weirder and more aggressive and difficult to treat.

Most chemotherapy works with the help of p53, first damaging the DNA itself, but then needing the p53 to take it from there by recognizing the overwhelming damage and then persuading the injured cell to die. No p53, and we get just the  chemo induced DNA damage, but the cell can live on and even reproduce faulty clones of itself. That is one reason 17p deletion carries such a bad prognosis.

Until we had ibrutinib (and now also idelalisib or Zydelig), our choices for treating 17p deleted CLL were poor- There were and are a few other therapies that do their killing independent of p53 induced cell suicide. Campath works if you don't have any big nodes, but comes with high infection risks. HDMP (high dose methylprednisolone) + R (rituximab) and flavoperidol and even lenalidomide helped some.

No great choices, until now.

I quote from the press release about the trial that lead to the ibrutinib approval:

At baseline, the median age of these patients was 67 years, 58% of whom had at least one tumor  >  5 cm, and 32% of whom had the del 17p mutation. Patients receiving IMBRUVICA demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) as compared to patients treated with ofatumumab. The median PFS and OS has not been reached on the IMBRUVICA arm. There was a 78% statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression or death as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) according to the modified IWCLL criteria (HR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.32). In addition, the analysis of overall survival demonstrated a 57% statistically significant reduction in the risk of death for patients in the IMBRUVICA arm (HR 0.43; 95 CI, 0.24 to 0.79). This was observed despite a total of 57 patients who were initially randomized to ofatumumab crossing over to receive IMBRUVICA prior to the analysis. For previously treated del 17p CLL patients, there was a 75% reduction in the risk of progression or death as assessed by an IRC (HR 0.25, 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.45).

Ibrutinib seems to do well on all the folks like me with a missing 17p chromosome on our FISH test, and probably even better for the treatment naive 17p deleted patient. Here is another abstract from the NIH on the subject.

This is good news, right now for just those 17p deletion frontline, but I hope it is only the beginning.

I believe these drugs and others in the pipeline need to be available to all appropriate treatment naive patients, not just those with 17p deletion.

It shouldn't be that most of us have to fail chemo first before being offered less toxic options. The ibrutinib data from the earliest trials suggest those who get ibrutinib upfront before any chemo do the best.

That is why there are some really important clinical trials out there to consider for those who will soon be needing their first treatment for their CLL. Here are a few of my favorites.

With ibrutinib or Imbruvica:

Rituximab and Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Rituximab and Ibrutinib, or Ibrutinib Alone in Treating Older Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Ibrutinib and Rituximab Compared With Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab in Treating Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

With idelalisib or Zydelig or CAL101: 

A Study of Idelalisib (GS1101CAL101) + Ofatumumab in Previously Untreated CLL/SLL

A Study of Idelalisib and Rituximab in Elderly Patients With Untreated CLL or SLL

Efficacy and Safety of Idelalisib in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Subjects With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

With ABT-199 or GDC-0199:

A Study of GDC-0199 (ABT-199) in Combination With Obinutuzumab in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

This is by no means a complete list. There are at least 222 trials when you search untreated CLL on Clinicaltrials.gov.

These trials are critical so we can finally prove, as I suspect, that moving these drugs upfront and avoiding chemo all together, is our best course for a long and healthy life.

There are a few other exciting early trials using ROR1 for relapsed disease that Dr. Kipps will be discussing in my next post, an interview from ASCO. ROR1 may prove to be the holy grail of a marker that is truly unique to the CLL cells, making it the perfect target for an anti-cancer drug.

This is with a very exciting and very specific antibody developed by Dr. Kipps' team at UCSD. It should be opening very soon.

This is from Dr. Wierda's team at MDACC and CLL Global Alliance, building on the promising work out of U. Penn with CART-T cells directed at the much less specific CD19.

Both these are phase 1 trials with all the risks and possible breakthroughs that come with being early to a new therapy. My ibrutinib trial, though later in development, was still a phase 1/2 trial.

There are growing choices out there for those of us facing therapy for the first time, and for those who have relapsed. 

Clinical trials are the only way our knowledge can grow, and the only way these drugs will ever become widely available.

And clinical trials are for many of us, especially in frontline settings, the only path to getting these new agents. 

Speaking of new drugs being available, July 28 was also the date that the FDA gave final approval for Ibrutinib for those who have received one prior therapy. The accelerated conditional approval six months ago had been based on phase 2 data, the final approval looked at the big phase 3 RESONATE trial data.

More from Dr. Kipps on ROR1 soon from our interview at ASCO 2014.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

More Good News- Update on My Lab, CT Scans, and General CLL (chronic lymphocytic leukemia) Status

My blog has veered far away from the simple telling of my story to more telling of our stories with much B roll.

I am making plans to maybe bifurcate its content in the future, but for now it will continue its happy and diverse life as a personal health blog, a home for research news and video and audio interviews with leading researchers, and a whole bunch of personal analysis and advocacy on what it all means.

I am back from Ohio State where I am still seeing the research team every 3 months and getting CT scans every six months for my clinical trial on ibrutinib. I have riffed on this being too much radiation before in this prior post that includes links to some of the basic research of radiation exposure and its risks, but Dr. Byrd argues that the few relapses he sees on ibrutinib show up first in the nodes, so he wants to monitor me with the scans.

True enough. When I relapsed post failed hematopoeitic stem cell transplant in 2008, the nodes were my canary in the coal mine showing slight growth months before my lymphocyte counts started to move up and my platelets down.

So twice a year CTs are still the plot line for my clinical trial at OSU.

Since diagnosed in 2005, I have probably had about two dozen CT scans!

Add to that the equivalent of the 20 chest X-rays annually I get from flying over 100,000 miles a year, and my risk of secondary cancer is significant. This link with a NASA produced video tells the air travel part of the story.

If you really want to worry, take a look at this article from Medscape on CT scans in NHL.

But this post is not about the danger of CT scans, but about what my last one showed and happily that was stable disease.

I still have enlarged lymph nodes but they have changed little since October of 2012, or for the last 20 of my total of 25 plus months on ibrutinib. My largest sentinel gut node near my liver was about 10 cm at its peak, 7.3 x 3.3 cm just before starting ibrutinib, 4.4 x 0.7 cm in October, 2012 after about 6 months on the medication, then it shrunk to its shortest 3.9 x 0.7 three months later and when last measured on June 30, 2014 was 4.4 x 0.4 which actually represents its lowest volume. It has been fluctuating and when you account for the difficulty of measuring mobile objects in the mesentery and near the liver, is mostly stable since its dramatic shrinking in the first 6 months of therapy. Its a long hot dog shaped node instead of the more common bean shape. The same early dramatic shrinking in the first six months and slight ups and downs since has been the tale for my other smaller sentinel nodes on the scans.

So I have pretty stable disease.

What does this mean to still have enlarged nodes and a touch of CLL in my blood (see this prior post from last April on my flow cytometry report to understand more about my numbers and disease burden)?

The CLL does not proliferate in our blood, so the disease in our nodes and bone marrow are the source of all our problems and I will ignore the blood for now.

There is good reason to believe that these enlarged nodes are still full of CLL, but that it is not proliferating, thanks to the signal blocking from ibrutinib preventing it from getting the messages from its nurse like cells and others to be fruitful and multiply. So chock full of CLL, but it's dormant.

The other more positive interpretation is that these enlarged nodes are just the scarred down skeletons of the cancerous nodes they once were, and there is no residual disease to be found. Unfortunately, I am skeptical of this more PolyAnna hypothesis, and short of a biopsy which is not going to happen, there is not way to know for sure.

So what to do to avoid waking the Kraken?

Hope my genomic instability as evidenced by my 17p and 11q deletions and my complex karyotype will continue to behave with the ibrutinib aboard and not mutate so that my magical bullet no longer covalently binds BTK and blocks its activity?

Knock down the residual disease by adding a second or even a third agent?

Be reactive or proactive?

That is the question du jour faced by many of us now and more in the future whose CLL is controlled but it is not gone now with the new medications such as ibrutinib and idelalisib.

I have probed this recurring and unanswered question in more detail a prior post, and will soon be updating my thoughts on how to avoid being left stranded on third base and not getting home to a cure.

The rest of my news is also good.

My blood counts are boring and despite dropping my cyclosporin to a token dose of only 25 mgs once a day and stretching my 40 grams of IVIG infusions to every 7-8 weeks, my ITP also remains dormant. I think the possible immune stabilizing activity of ibrutinib and my low disease burden may be the factors  that have given me this long ride with high normal platelet counts. I have not been anemic for many months now and my neutrophils and the rest of the CBC are all copasetic. My blood chemistries are in the normal range and only my very low immunoglobulins, namely IGA, IGM, and IGG give proof to that fact that I still have a B cell leukemia, albeit a very sleepy and well behaved one.

More personal clinical and general CLL news soon, nearly all of it good.

I will be posting some of my interviews from ASCO 2014, plus sharing some exciting advocacy news. Busy times.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 2, 2014

iwCLL 2013: Dr. Michael Hallek Discusses Clinical Trials in Germany versus the USA and BR versus FCR

Happy New Year.

I am in Alameda, enjoying babysitting my 7 month old and 2 1/2 year old granddaughters. Needless to say, finding a second to get any work done is tough, but the joy of being with them makes my inefficiency a small price to pay.

Today, I am returning to share additional relevant interviews from iwCLL a few months ago.

In the first part of my interview on September 11, the last day of iwCLL 2013, Professor Hallek first discusses some of the differences in clinical trials on either side of the pond.

One subject Prof. Hallek does not mention is the greater willingness of European patients to be randomized in a trial. Canadians and Americans prefer more control in deciding their therapy, and that helps explain the generally lower accrual in North American studies that have two or more randomized arms. I admit that one reason I was drawn to my trial, the official title being,  An Open-label, Phase 1b/2, Safety and Efficacy Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (Btk) Inhibitor, PCI-32765, and Ofatumumab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma and Prolymphocytic Leukemiawas that I was assured that I would be getting PCI-32765, AKA, ibrutinib, AKA, Imbruvica. Phase 3 trials rarely offer that certainty, unless there is a cross-over and that is a big ongoing issue.

Keep in mind that the  calculus of accrual is entirely different when we are looking at the new non-chemo agents, where trials offering some of the exciting new drugs have filled at record rates.

Also don't miss the professor's definition of young.

I like it.

Next, Prof. Hallek, presages with great accuracy what was going to be announced a few months later  in at an abstract presented in New Orleans at ASH 2013, namely that BR is gentler on the marrow, but less effective than FCR. His take on what to do with that data is the real gem in our conversation. Listen to how he describes tailoring of the therapy to the individual patient.

Dr. Jeff Sharman whose interviews have and will continue to pop up here, has a nice review of the ASH data on his excellent blog.

Here is Professor Hallek, who was very busy chairing iwCLL, so I very much appreciate his time.  Sadly when my flight to New Orleans was canceled, I had to also cancel my follow-up interview at ASH, but we get the full story here and from the abstract.

Many, myself included, wonder if the whole question of BR versus FCR is moot as the era of chemo-immunotherapy may be ending in CLL. We have spent many blog posts discussing this issue, and we aren't finished yet.

Here is Professor Hallek:



More soon.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, May 20, 2013

Personal Travels


With ASCO (AmericanSociety of Clinical Oncology) and EHA (European Hematology Association) upcoming, a significant backlog of abstracts to review, promised synopsis of critical issues, important editorials, and still some videos from ASH, I am going to grab this moment at the airport in Orlando to update my crazy spring.

First the biggest most important news:

My oldest daughter gave birth this weekend to our second beautiful granddaughter. Mother and baby are doing great (if you don't consider the sleep deprivation), and I am flying to Alameda to meet the newest member of our happy growing family. I can’t wait to hold her and smell her and kiss her.

Sydney Lilah

It is being alive for moments such as this that remind me why I fought so hard to travel across the country a year ago leaving the California sunshine for an Ohio winter, uprooting my wife and myself for months, and risking a new unproven therapy to knock back my CLL and ITP. But my calculated gamble has been an unmitigated success, offering me chances to see so much more than I could have dreamed possible. And no sight will be sweeter than my new grandchild.

Now that baby has safely arrived after a very quick and natural labor and delivery, my schedule is a little more solid.

This frantic spurt of travel started at the end of April with my trip to Columbus, Ohio for my treatment. I stayed a few extra days due to scheduled CT scans, an opportunity to tour of the new hospital and Dr. Byrd’s wonderful lab (the highlight was meeting the bright and enthusiastic PHDs, MDs, and other lab staff), meals with Dr. Byrd and other friends, new and old, and an amazing Mark Rothko exhibit at the Columbus art museum.

Rothko

When back home, I had time to catch a hockey game (Go Kings Go) where the Kings beat St Louis in the Stanley Cup playoffs, before driving up to the Bay area to help my then expectant daughter and son-in-law with the toddler. That didn’t stop me from flying to Vancouver, Canada for a few wonderful days of a west coast all boys high school reunion (UTS or University of Toronto Schools) that included kayaking in Deep Cove, a gondola ride to the snow and the grizzly bears at the top of Grouse Mountain, and poignant memories.

Deep Cove, British Columbia

Now I am writing this post from a plane leaving Orlando where I attended a two day primary care medical conference.

Once back in the bay area, I will be driving back to Orange County for a day or two, then onto San Diego for one day for more learning.

Before the next week is over, and after spending time at the office, getting trained on a new EHR (electronic health record) module, and visiting the infusion lab for my life saving IVIG and a routine check-up with my local CLL doc, Dr. Sharma, I will be leaving for five nights in Chicago to cover ASCO with Andrew Schorr and Patient Power. So far Drs. Byrd and Wierda are aboard for interviews and several other familiar faces are very likely. I will also be interviewing experts on other hematological malignancies and on some solid tumors for Patient Power.

Only two days after ASCO, things get real crazy. I will be driving up to Santa Clara to lecture with Dr. Steven Coutre out of Stanford on anemia and MDS (myelodysplastic syndrome), a too common complication of CLL and its treatment. From there, just hours after I finish, I drive to SFO to fly to Stockholm for only three days to share my experience with ibrutinib from a patient’s perspective just before the EHA meeting (European Hematology Association), then rush back to the bay area the day before I leave for Chicago to see my younger daughter, just back from her delayed honeymoon in Spain and Morocco.

After another brief visit with my daughter, son-in-law and the grandkids in Alameda, the drive to SoCal gets me home in time for more doctors’ visits, clinic hours, a local CLL support group, seeing my son Ben off to Stonehenge for the summer solstice with the Druids, all followed by a two days car trip to La Jolla for more medical education conference, this time on heart failure organized by UCSD.

A week earlier, my son, Will is flying to Israel for 10 days, and I hope to arrange a meeting up with my bone marrow donor.

The next weekend I am in Baltimore for more med. ed., and the extra bonus of catching the Max Weber exhibit at the Baltimore Museum of Art.

This is the last year of my CME cycles in Canada and the USA, and I must squeeze in a lot of hours to meet my requirements. Now I have to overload my credits to catch up before the end of June. Poor planning and other priorities lead to this crisscrossing of the country.

July 3, I have been ask to lead a CLL support group for UCSD on their campus in San Diego.

In between, I have scheduling and planning teleconferences and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

No more travel is scheduled for July until I need to be back in Columbus, Ohio again in the third week, and I am so looking forward to not leaving home for a few weeks.

This frenetic pace is not sustainable or healthy. I nap often at the hotels and on the planes. I wear an N95 mask and gobs of hand sanitizer. I treat myself to the best vegan meals I can find on the road ( which is not saying much) and I always try to see more of the town that I am visiting than the hotel lobby. In Orlando, I hiked though a lush swamp with catfish and egrets and Spanish moss that was just minutes from the silly shopping malls and alligator miniature golf courses near my hotel. No amusement parks for this traveler.

Shingle Trail, Orlando

Then I took a long nap.

I bring my comfort foods (organic raw nuts and fine Japanese green tea), meet old friends, do work that I love, and have a rare opportunity to make a small but meaningful difference in the world.

This schedule was an extraordinary confluence of opportunities and my inability to say no to spread the word about how cancer treatment is changing. I admit there is desperation to all this journeying, but I know my time is limited and I want every moment to matter.

If I was more at peace, perhaps I could sense the gravity and power found in standing still, like a mountain, like a master, but I am still a breezy soul.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

My Interview at OSU for the Ibrutinib Trial

This is the article that discusses my clinical trial. My photo with Dr. Byrd is on the cover on the magazine and I was interviewed for the text. The writer, Kendall Powell made everything so easy.
I pasted the full article below, but the whole online journal is worth reading. I got no end of teasing from my oncology colleagues about the picture of Dr. Byrd and me on the cover. Dr. Kipps was especially sweet in his comments.

The same issue of Frontiers contains this worthwhile article on Dr. Byrd's research on page 9 of the PDF version on the journal. It can be a bit slow to load, but it's worth the wait.

Lots of other interesting reading for those interested in how the darkness in being push back in CLL in particular and cancer in general. I particularly enjoyed in the article on page 8 on inflammation and its role in the the rare lymphoma, LGL.

Later this month, I will be back in Columbus for more CT scans and lab tests, but I will also have the special opportunity to visit the research lab. I am anticipating learning much about cutting edge technology in interrogating cancer calls and the body's responses. 

As much as I love the folks at the James, it has been nice to have my 84 days away.

Here is the article on CLL and my trial:
Ibrutinib is a targeted drug that in early clinical testing has produced lasting remissions and few side effects in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Read: “About Face for Chronic Leukemia: http://ow.ly/jVZjc

Origin of CLL and the Molecular Mechanism of Ibrutinib
Multipotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) give rise to healthy B lymphocytes. Recent evidence suggests that genetic changes at the HSC level lead to monoclonal B cells that then give rise to CLL cells. Enlargement: The experimental oral agent ibrutinib blocks B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, thereby preventing B-cell activation and proliferation. Ibrutinib binds irreversibly with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), a protein that is overexpressed in CLL and other B-cell malignancies. This blocks signals from the B-cell receptor that are essential for CLL-cell survival and proliferation and triggers cell death.

ABOUT-FACE FOR CHRONIC LEUKEMIA

Ibrutinib is a targeted drug that in early clinical testing has produced lasting remissions and few side effects in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

By KENDALL POWELL
A few days before Christmas 2011, physician assistant Margaret Lucas walked into her chronic lymphocytic leukemia clinic to see a dozen patients and for a moment wondered if she'd entered a flu vaccination clinic by mistake. The patients were smiling, looking well, all had their hair and no one was fighting an infection or required a blood transfusion. "Nobody needed anything from me," she recalls. "It was really overwhelming."

They did need one thing: refills of their once-daily dose of the pill that was keeping these relapsed leukemia patients healthy.

That day was in stark contrast to the usual clinic day. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy that typically requires a mix of treatment options depending on the individual. Many newly diagnosed patients have an asymptomatic, indolent form of the disease that requires close monitoring only, sometimes for many years. Often, a routine blood test reveals the abnormally high lymphocyte count and leads to diagnosis. Median survival can exceed 10 years.

Other patients have an aggressive form of CLL that requires immediate treatment. Survival for these patients is about one or two years when untreated and two to five years when treated.

"CLL is the most common and prevalent adult leukemia in the Western Hemisphere," says John C. Byrd, MD, a CLL specialist and professor of Medicine, of Medicinal Chemistry and of Veterinary Biosciences at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC - James).

"More than 100,000 people in the U.S. are walking around with it, and it is not curable with current therapy. The median age at diagnosis is 72, and nearly 4,600 patients were likely to die from CLL in 2012," says Byrd, who co-leads the CLL Experimental Therapeutics Research Laboratory.

CLL is believed to begin as a premalignant disorder of B lymphocytes called monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL). Additional gene mutations in B cells or signals from the bone-marrow microenvironment probably drive progression of MBL to CLL and result in the proliferation of ineffective B lymphocytes that lead to abnormal immunoglobulin production and autoimmune disorders. With progression, CLL cells crowd into lymph nodes and the spleen and liver, painfully enlarging those organs. The disease disrupts red-blood-cell and platelet production, leading to anemia and bleeding.

Treatment with traditional chemotherapy drugs could keep the disease in remission for a while but does not improve overall survival. In the late 1990s, drugs with greater activity against CLL were developed. They included rituximab, a monoclonal antibody designed to target leukemia cells, and fludarabine, a purine analogue that destroys both B and T cells. These agents produced more frequent and longer remissions, but the disease eventually recurs and usually resists further treatment.

Currently, there is no curative therapy for CLL, other than possibly a high-risk hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Moreover, CLL is associated with a wide range of potentially fatal hematopoietic and immune-system complications. A common first-line treatment combines fludarabine, the alkylating agent cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. This regimen, called FCR, has a 70-percent complete-remission rate, but almost all patients eventually relapse, and FCR often worsens the hematopoietic and immune-system complications.

Unfortunately, patients over age 65, who represent about two-thirds of the CLL population, generally cannot tolerate FCR treatment because it puts patients at high risk of respiratory and other infections. Instead, older patients may be treated with drugs such as chlorambucil and rituximab, though these agents are less effective at producing lasting remissions.

"We need newer therapies for older patients - therapies that keep patients in remission longer and don't have the immunosuppressive side effects of chemotherapy," Byrd says. "Our quest is to identify targeted therapies that selectively kill leukemia cells."

PRECLINICAL FINDINGS
Ibrutinib (or PCI-32765) has the potential to fulfill all of Byrd's requirements. Pharmacyclics, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., licensed the drug from Celera Genomics in 2006. Recognizing the OSUCCC - James group as a leader in preclinical research and early-phase trials of new drugs for CLL, Pharmacyclics approached Byrd and the OSUCCC - James CLL Experimental Therapeutics Laboratory about testing ibrutinib.

Ibrutinib belongs to a class of drugs called B-cell receptor (BCR) antagonists. The B-cell receptor is overexpressed in CLL, and BCR signaling is essential for B-cell maturation and growth. Having already tested another B-cell agonist, CAL101/GS1101, that was proving to be effective in early clinical testing, the team agreed to put ibrutinib through the same preclinical paces.

Ibrutinib binds to and inhibits a molecule called Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), a protein that is essential for BCR signaling and is overexpressed by CLL cells. By inhibiting BTK, ibrutinib prevents BCR signaling and B-cell activation, says Amy Johnson, PhD, a research assistant professor in the Division of Hematology and a molecular pharmacologist.

"But when we expose CLL cells to ibrutinib in lab dishes, they don't instantly die. When we first saw this in the lab, we were kind of worried because ibrutinib is not highly cytotoxic," she says. "We learned there is more to it than that."

The team pushed ahead with experiments to test ibrutinib in CLL cells and mouse models. In a2011 paper published in the journal Blood, the group showed that CLL cells overexpress BTK, that ibrutinib makes CLL cells more susceptible to apoptosis compared with normal B cells, and that the agent had no toxic effect on T cells.

Ibrutinib also quashed the proliferation of BCR-activated B cells and shut down their survival pathways. Finally, their laboratory studies showed that the drug blocked survival signals that CLL cells receive from the microenvironment, including IL-6, IL-4, TNF-α and stromal-cell contact.

In subsequent research, Johnson tested ibrutinib on a mouse strain that spontaneously develops a CLL-like leukemia at about nine months of age. (The mice carry B cells that overexpress a human oncogene called TCL1.) "If we provide continuous treatment with ibrutinib starting when they are really young, we can prevent the leukemia from developing," says Johnson.

In another experiment, the team transplanted the leukemic cells from the TCL1 mouse model into 100 mice without leukemia. Then, at the time of leukemia diagnosis (by flow cytometry), they gave the mice ibrutinib daily in their drinking water. The treated animals had a significantly longer overall survival than control animals at 46 days versus 24 days, respectively.

Using mouse genetic models, the team has also shown that BTK is indeed a critical target in the development of CLL. In both mice and humans, a mutation that knocks out the function of BTK causes the immune deficiency hypogammaglobulinemia. Johnson and her team crossed the mouse with the mutated BTK gene with the TCL1 mouse. The resulting offspring, which in essence are predisposed to develop CLL but have BTK permanently disabled, do not develop the leukemia at nine months as usually happens, and most were behaving normally and appeared free of side effects after more than 12 months.

"So we've shown that inhibiting BTK - both pharmacologically and genetically - prevents leukemia from developing in mice," says Johnson.
TRIALS WITHOUT TRIBULATIONS

In the meantime, clinical testing of ibrutinib was moving forward. In 2010, trials began in patients whose CLL had relapsed and was refractory to other treatments. In phase I and II trials, cohorts of CLL patients experienced a 90-percent response rate in terms of shrinking lymph nodes, spleens and white blood cell counts, and improving anemia. In 70 percent of patients with relapsed disease, ibrutinib removed detectable CLL cells from the blood, with a partial response or better, Byrd says.

"Ibrutinib has really opened up a door of hope for people," says Lucas. Turnarounds like those of her Christmastime-clinic patients were characteristic of most patients put on ibrutinib. "It's dramatic," she says.

One such patient is Brian Koffman, a family physician who lives in Newport Beach, Calif. The 61-year-old has been living with an aggressive variant of CLL for seven years. He underwent a stem-cell transplant and rituximab therapy, both of which failed. A complication called autoimmune thrombocytopenia made pursuing the harsher therapies, such as FCR, a high-risk choice.

At one point, he grew a "Santa-beard" to hide his massively swollen lymph nodes from his own patients. After participating in the phase II ibrutinib-plus-ofatumumab trial for eight months, his lymph nodes are no longer palpable and his blood work is "boringly normal," he says.

"What's most notable about ibrutinib is that, with more than two years of follow-up, the median time to relapse has not yet been reached. The drug - a pill taken daily - is holding people in remission," Byrd explains. And the side-effect profile of ibrutinib? "Compared to most new chemotherapy drugs, it's apples to oranges," Byrd says.

Koffman had some mild diarrhea, heartburn and a couple of rashes. All typical, he says. 
"People are using the word revolutionary to describe ibrutinib – we have never had a medication that worked so well with so few side effects." -

Margaret Lucas, PA
"Overall, taking the medication is a non-event." Fatigue and bruising are also common. Even though the trial requires him to fly to Columbus frequently, Koffman calls his participation "one of the best decisions I've ever made."

Because the trial in relapsed patients has gone so well, and because the drug does not appear to increase infection risk further in CLL, Byrd wanted to move ibrutinib into a trial for first-line treatment of patients over 65, giving it as monotherapy.

The results in this previously untreated, over-65 patient group are "similarly spectacular," Lucas says. At 27 months, 96 percent of this group of 31 patients was progression-free. "With chemotherapy, we would expect this to be about 50 percent.

"People are using the word revolutionary to describe ibrutinib - we have never had a medication that worked so well with so few side effects."

Byrd, who typically speaks in measured, reserved tones, also cannot hide his enthusiasm: "It's beating the socks off other treatment options. This class of drug is going to transform CLL just as Gleevec did for CML," he says, referring to the molecularly targeted drug for chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Byrd doesn't use "transform" lightly - he and Lucas have seen patients' lymph nodes and spleens shrink within the first week of treatment; patients who thought they were headed for hospice care instead head out on cruises and trips to Europe. Simply put, says Byrd, "It's an amazing drug."
NEXT STEPS

Ibrutinib could be game-changing for the treatment of end-stage CLL, which too often is a frustrating act of moving patients from one therapy to the next and hoping for the best. “With ibrutinib, we have some patients on their second and third years of treatment with no relapses," Lucas notes.

Byrd cautions that resistance could occur in the future. And even though the numbers of patients who have relapsed on ibrutinib or who cannot tolerate the drug are very small, doctors need a next-drug in the arsenal to offer those patients. This might be an improved, second-generation BTK inhibitor (akin to dasatinib and nilotinib for Gleevec), he explains.

Lab researchers will investigate the question of resistance and what happens when mice stop taking the drug. Clinicians want to know if ibrutinib, which also kills healthy B cells, will cause long-term immune suppression and whether the drug has benefit for treating early-stage CLL.

Currently, ibrutinib is entering phase III testing for both previously untreated CLL and for relapsed patients. In the RESONATE trial taking place in 44 centers around the world, 350 relapsed or refractory CLL patients will be randomized to receive either ibrutinib or the monoclonal antibody drug ofatumumab. In the RESONATE-2 trial, 272 patients 65 or older with previously untreated CLL will be randomized to receive either ibrutinib or chlorambucil.

Byrd has conducted translational studies of CLL for 15 years, moving from laboratory bench to patient bedside and back to the bench, working to improve CLL treatment. Lucas has worked with him that entire time and says ibrutinib is unlike anything they have seen before.

"I've seen Campath, rituximab and fludarabine as they were introduced. They can make patients incredibly sick and vulnerable to fatal infections," she says. "The more specifically targeted agents that we can find for malignancies, the better."

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Poster Boy for OSU


Here is my 15 minutes of fame as I get to share the spotlight with Dr. John Byrd on the cover of the online and snail mail OSUCCR or James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute quarterly magazine: frontiers.

I found out about hard copies being mailed out to thousands of heme/oncs across the country when my local hematologist, Dr. Sanjay Sharma teased me about the color choice of my sweater. I do think Dr. Byrd and I look pretty collegial. I get that I have been co-opted by the Buckeye Nation and I proudly accept.

It was clearly a honor and a privilege to help promote the good work being done at OSU in general and by Dr. Byrd in particular and to also push participation in clinical trials at the James and elsewhere.

Follow the link to find the actual article on page 14 and you will also find Dr. Byrd in his white coat on page 9 describing some of his lab work. Much good information on CLL research in both articles.

Today, I am being cared for by my own medical group, namely at the St Jude Heritage Medical Group cancer infusion center getting my IVIG.

I am very lucky to have this incredible network of care.

My CBC is already back and remains boringly normal.  No anemia, low lymphocytes and high platelets. Life is good. More results including my critical bone marrow findings to follow soon.

But first, let me enjoy the sunshine of brief moments of fame.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 24, 2013

ASH 2012: Dr. Tom Kipps on Genetics, Epigenetics, and Targeted Therapy

In the third of a four part interview with my CLL doctor, Dr. Tom Kipps out of UCSD, we hear him present a vision of the future of "personalized" cancer therapy in general and CLL in particular.

But he also tells us what targeted therapies are available right now in clinical trials near you.

In CLL, it is less about the genetic code and more about the epigenetics. This crucial and relatively recent understanding has been critical in advancing therapies because the pinpoint DNA damage seen in CML such as the telltale fused Philadelphia chromosome are frustratingly less of a glaring target in CLL. However, when the researchers instead started identifying the overly activated pathways in our clonal B cells, the progress sped up in decoding and quickly thereafter, controlling our disease. Dr. Kipps walks you through the difference in these approaches.

Dr. Sharman talks about this insight in one of my prior post, and here Dr. Kipps makes it all easy to understand. He also explains combination therapies, the importance of the new and old generations mAbs (monoclonal antibodies) including 1st generation rituximab, 2nd generation ofatuzamab, and the promise of the powerful 3rd generation GA-101 or another mouthful of a name, obinutuzumab, all directed at CD20, re-use of some drugs already approved for other cancers, and CAR-T therapy

Eleven minuted well spent. Dr. Kipps breaks it all down into bite size pieces.

Learn and enjoy:



Part Four with Dr. Kipps will be coming soon and I still have Drs. Wiestner and Furman in the video vault. ASH 2012 was an amazing meeting, jam-packed with hope and good news for those of us with CLL.

Personal notes:

I am still waiting for my final bone marrow biopsy report from OSU done Feb 5, 2013. FISH and cytogenetics should be back by now, and I hate the suspense.

Back home from studying hematology for hematologists at the 17th Annual International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies – Focus on Leukemias, Lymphomas, and Myeloma in Manhattan and the MDACC hematology board reviews, so I can be more fluent in speaking about the buzz around small molecules such as ibrutinib, ABT-199 and idelalisib in treating other B-cell lymphomas in particular and blood cancers in general.

I will also return to posting more on the personal and human aspects of dealing with an incurable cancer, but for right now, my priority is to get all the remaining ASH 2012 videos online over the next few weeks.

Next weekend, I am off to Washington DC to lecture to the National Sleep Foundation on "The Sleepy Patient". Then I am home for several weeks in a row. Yeah!

In the spring and fall, I will be flying all over the place again teaching other doctors about anemia (MDS or myelodysplastic syndrome that can be a challenging late complication of CLL and some of the chemotherapy used to treat it), gout and thyroid disease. I will be posting my ASH 2012 interviews with Dr. Steensma on MDS here soon.

For any health care providers reading this blog, and to anyone else interested, for another few weeks until March 6, 2013, at Primary Issues, an online medical journal, you can receive ACCME accredited CME on the recognition and early lab testing of CLL or just learn from my article and interviews with Drs. Wiestner and Kipps done at ASH 2011. That San Diego meeting 14 months ago is where I made the fateful decision to enroll in the clinical trial NCT01217749 at OSU that has served me so well.

My love is teaching and my special love is teaching hematology and making sure that the patients and their providers are teamed together to offer the best possible care for each individual case. That's what I want to do more and more.

I am hoping to find some funding do more of these interviews and news coverage for patients and healthcare providers alike, to expand beyond the big ASH meeting to ASCO and IWCLL and more. Next up will be ASCO at the end of May, where I bet there will be important updates on ibrutinib, idelalisib, ABT-199, obinutuzumab and others.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

OSU Update: All Good

I left sunny warm SoCal for cold and snowy Columbus, Ohio, but it was so worth it.

Labs remains stable with essentially normal red blood cells, white blood cells and platelet counts and differential, and boring blood chemistries.  Despite an small audience of student nurses, my bone marrow biopsy went well. It's harder to whine when it hurts if you have aspiring members of the healthcare team staring at your bottom and diligently taking notes. So let me take this opportunity in the privacy of my guest room to say OUCH now.

Results are weeks away.

Dr. Byrd is very happy with my progress, feels the slowed nodal shrinkage noted on my most recent CT scans last month is not a concern in anyway, and I am on a good trajectory.

After my clinic visit and biopsy, I had another interview and photo shoot with their very down to earth and professional marketing team at the James Hospital. This time I am really going to be the poster boy displayed smiling on 8 x 2 feet banners throughout the hospital and possibly at international meetings to promote the hematology and lymphoma clinical trials at OSU. It's a cause that I can fully endorse. As we have heard before, there has never be a better or more important time for a CLL patient to consider a clinical trial and OSU should be high on our list.

This modicum of "fame" allows me to join the ranks of my friend Terry in our local CLL support group who is already the international face and voice of RITUXAN. If this stardom trend continues for our members, our little OC group might need to have its own reality TV show soon.

Insurance issues are on track to be worked out quickly thanks to the hard work and co-ordinated efforts of several folks at OSU and Blue Shield of California today so I am happily leaving town tomorrow informed and consented and officially rolled over into the new continuation trial with a full 84 days of ibrutinib. Yeah. Goodbye Columbus for 12 full weeks.

Hard to believe it's been a year since I first started in this trial, and now that phase of my life has ended.

The next time I am back at OSU at the end of April, spring will be in the air and Dr. Byrd has promised me a much coveted tour of his lab. The marketing team says they may video or shoot photos for my blog- wouldn't that be sweet?

It's been hectic. Despite my nerves about presenting to a "specialists" audience, my lecture on sleep disturbed breathing and heart failure at UCSD last weekend went over well and now I am feverishly preparing my next lecture for the Nation Sleep Foundation in Washington due on Friday.

Life is crazy, but good.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Quick Turn Around: 12 hours at OSU and leaving hungry, tired, but with good news and my Ibrutinib .

I just realized that I traveled across the country through 3 time zones with stops at 2 different airports coming and going to spend exactly 12 hours from midnight to noon in Columbus. Ohio. In that short time I rented a car, slept (way too little), scraped snow off my windshield and drove on icy roads (memories of Montreal but not part of my California life), then at OSU had a large bore IV started (ouch) for my 2 CT scans with contrast and blood work, got some of the results (my blood counts and chemistries are all unexciting and in the normal ranges, and my innards are looking more like those of someone without CLL, but I am not quite there yet because although my lymph nodes continue to shrink overall, a few are still enlarged in my gut), had a brief check-up (no palpable nodes), visited a friend at OSU with complications of his CLL, picked up my magic PCI-32765, swallowed the first 3 battleship grey pills for this cycle, and rebooked my flight to get home earlier. What I didn't do was eat anything (no time after the hospital and I was prohibited before by the CT and drug protocols) or get any rest.

That is what home is for.

Overall a good trip with good news.

Back in 4 weeks for a bone marrow biopsy, but I am thinking of staying 2 night this time so I can rest and visit with my Columbus friends.

That visit will be the one year anniversary of my joining the trial and will mark my ninth months of getting up a 1/2 hour early everyday to take my ibrutinib on an empty stomach.

Time is a jet plane. Literally.

More crucially, that clinic visit will be the cue for my entry into the rollover continuation trial where I will be seen only seen every 12 weeks, but still get CT scans every 84 days, at least for the first 2 cycles.

I understand that every patient who has reached that landmark visit which essentially ends his or her participation in Clinical Trial NCT01217749 and with it, access to ibrutinib, has been offered the chance to stay on drug and has chosen to continue in the new trial.

That seems like one of the easiest choice that I will ever make.

What a difference a year makes.

Labels: , , , , , ,